Friday, November 20, 2009

NFL Pick 5 -- Week 11

Week 11 is the hardest week of games to pick thus far in the NFL season. Period. I may have said that one or two other times that I recall here this season, but that's because it was true. At the time, some of those weeks were the hardest of the season to that point. Well this week sets a new bar. Week 11 is chock full of games between one decent team and one bad team, in one or the other's stadium, mostly carrying large spreads, making for a ton of games that are just really, really hard to pick. I did my part by starting off Week 10 on the wrong foot by taking Carolina and laying a few points at home against the Dolphins on Thursday night, a night which saw the Fins pound the ball on the ground and never give Jake Delhomme and the Panthers a chance to recover from some early mistakes and failures to score in the game. Sadly, that Thursday night game was the game I liked the most almost of the entire weekend, and I lost it. So there ya go. With that bout of confidence, here come my picks for Week 11, in no particular order:

1. Carolina Panthers -3 vs Miami Dolphins. Loss.

2. Indianapolis Colts -1 at Baltimore Ravens. I kinda like this Baltimore team, and I respect what they can do under the right circumstances, in particular on defense, having picked them to win a few big games earlier in the season already. But in this case I think this line is just plain silly to be this small, with Peyton Manning and the undefeated Colts coming in to a far older, slower version of the Ravens defense than what most people still think of for some reason when they think about Baltimore's NFL franchise. Peyton Manning has beaten down on this team the last two teams the two have met up, with Peyton throwing for more than 600 yards and 7 touchdowns with zero interceptions over those last two meetings. I'm not saying I'm calling for a Colts blowout here, but in essentially a pickem game I have got to go with the Colts here to win a good game on the road against a flat out inferior Ravens squad. Nobody passes against the blitz and the pressure defenses like Peyton Manning.

3. Minnesota Vikings -11 vs. the Seattle Seahawks. The Vikes have been great this year, and resurgent quarterback Brett Favre is on his way to one of his best seasons in years. At 8-1, the Vikings have scored at least 27 points in all 8 of their victories, including over 29 points per game at home in four tries so far in 2009. On the other side of the ledger are the Seahawks, who have been totally inconsistent this year either with or without Matt Hasselbeck at the helm, and whose only three wins this year have come against the Rams, the Jaguars, and the Lions. When the 2009 Seahawks play good teams, they get beat, especially on the road this year where they are 0-4 with a 13-point loss at San Francisco, a 17-point loss at Indy, a 21-point loss at Dallas, and most recently an 11-point defeat at Arizona. Do I like the Hawks to lose another double digit road game this year at Minnesota? Hells yeah.

4. New England Patriots -10.5 vs. the New York Jets. I am going against my better judgment here, as I am confident the Pats will emerge victorious this weekend but I cannot stand having to give more than a touchdown and a field goal in a game where the Jets held the Pats to just 9 points earlier in the season in a 16-9 defeat of the Pats in New Jersey York. But that said, I expect the Pats to beat down hard on the Jets this weekend for a number of reasons. First and foremost, they are better than the Jets. Clearly. In Week 2 when these two teams first matched up, this was the entire season for the Jets. It was their superbowl, and they were on their way to a 3-0 start and first place in the AFC East, new head coach Rex Ryan left a personal phone message for every single Jets season ticket holder about how much the team needed their support to beat the Pats at home for the first time since 2000. But now, it's all different. The Jets have imploded, Ryan Sanchez can't get anything done and Rex Ryan's vaunted defense has rolled over and caved repeatedly in five losses out of their last six games. Meanwhile, the Patriots return home this Sunday after that crushing loss to the Colts on Sunday night, where the team will likely not only be motivated by revenge after their Week 2 loss to the Jets but also by anger after all the harangue surrounding Bellicheat's 4th-and-2 coaching decision to lose that Colts game. And the Pats come home hot, averaging nearly 39 points per game over their last four against a team who has had trouble stopping the opposition as the game wears on. And let's not forget that the Pats haven't lost two games back to back in several seasons as I recall. I expect the Pats to put on a real show in front of the home town fans and to do their best to come out angry, aggressive, and exact their revenge. 10.5 seems a bit high for this game, but I will still take the Pats and lay the points here, expecting at least a two-touchdown victory in New England on Sunday.

5. New Orleans Saints -11 at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Don't ask me why I'm taking the Saints to win big against another bad team this week, after they have failed to show up early in each of their last few games, all against subpar competition. But something just tells me that the NFC's best team is going to open a can of whoopass on the Bucs, whom I just don't think have the receivers to move the ball downfield, the running game to control the clock and keep the juggernaut Saints' offense off the field, nor the defense to hold the Saints under at least the mid-30s on the day. I'll take the Saints and lay the points, and just plan to hold my nose through the first half on Sunday.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Thursday Night Football Pick

It's Thursday, and that means the NFL is back at us with the second of their recently new Thursday Night Football matchups that much of the country does not get to see due to not having the NFL Network. This Thursday's matchup sends the Miami Dolphins to the Carolina Panthers, and the Panthers are favored by 3 points as they have slowly crept up all week. 3 is an annoying number to have to get them at when I've been looking at this line all week, but in the end I'm still going to take the Carolina Panthers +3 vs. the Miami Dolphins for Thursday night in Carolina. Carolina is one of those teams that have quietly really improved since a very slow start, and now just sit a win or two out of the NFC playoff picture as I wrote earlier this week. Carolina has stepped it up in basically all positions since their 0-3 start, as Jake Delhomme has now not thrown an interception in three consecutive starts, DeAngelo Williams has run for 150 yards three times in his last five games (and just under 100 in the other two), and the team defense has basically held its last three opponents -- all solid offenses across the board in Atlanta, New Orleans and Arizona -- in check in going 2-1 over that span. Meanwhile, the Dolphins, a team that I like overall, have gone 1-3 on the road this season so far, with all three losses by double digits, and they have only scored more than 17 points once in four road attempts this season. Although the team has had a bit of a resurgence in its last four games under new quarterback Chad Henne, just this week the team announced that Ronnie Brown is on the IR and out for the season due to injury, and Brown is more than just the team's top runningback -- he is also the guy at the helm of the team's most common wildcat formation plays. That should really upset things a bit on the Miami offense, and this one seems like a touchdown win at least for the Panthers the way I see it.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

NFL Winners and Losers -- Week 10

Another week, another 3-2 for my picks, and really that's more like 3-1-1 as my Lions +16.5 was actually Lions +17 which all of those who bet it know, making that my first push of the NFL season in actual practice for anyone who is actually betting these games. This week in my picks started off solid with the 49ers winning by just enough against the Bears on Thursday night, then saw me lose two of two in the early games on Sunday with the Lions (really the push) and the Broncos who somehow managed to lose to the Redskins. But then the late games brought me back over .500 for the week as my Packers call was right on, as was the Kansas City pick at the Raiders, and that brings my posted season record to 28-17, back to a season-high 11 over .500. Even though I normally find these games easier to pick as the season wears on, this year it seems to be the opposite as many of these weeks are a real chore to pore through the games and find the five I like the most.

With that, here is the Week 10 Winners and Losers report.

Winners:

1. The Cincinnati Bengals. That's right, these are not your father's Bungles anymore, at least not this year. This weekend the Bengals completed a season sweep of division rival and defending superbowl champion Pittsburgh Steelers by clamping down the defense and refusing to give Steelers qb Ben Roethlisberger any breathing room at all. And this comes one week after the Bengals completed a season sweep against also tough division rival Baltimore, leaving the Bengals now 5-0 in the AFC North for the first time in franchise history. As much as the offense is finding ways to score enough to win these games, it's the defense that's leading the way as I've been saying here for weeks, and Week 10 was no different as the Bengals held the Steelers to just four field goals on the day while the Bengals chipped in with four fg's of their own in addition to a kickoff return in the first quarter that was the difference. With their next three games lined up to include the Raiders, the Browns and the Lions, there is a good chance we could be looking at a 10-2 Bengals team heading into the key Week 14 matchup at the Minnesota Vikings.

2. Vince Young and the Tennessee Titans. Say what you want about the lack of oomph in Vince Young's numbers, but his team is now 3-0 since VY took the helm after starting off 0-6 under last year's quarterback Kerry Collins. Not that all of this is directly attributable just to Vince Young, who himself has thrown for just two touchdowns with one pick in three starts this season, but the bottom line is that Young has clearly improved in all three games, and his efficiency at the position has helped lead the team down the field both through the air as well as on the ground. Since Young took over at qb, the Titans are not only 3-0 but they are averaging 35 points per game after managing to exceed 17 points only one time in six games prior to Young becoming the starter. Chris Johnson, the explosive runningback in Tennessee, has had three out of three huge 100+ yardage performances on the ground with Young running the show, after just two triple-digit games in six tries to start the season with Kerry Collins at qb, and even the defense has responded in a big way to the switch, ceding just 19 points per game in three wins under Vince Young after allowing 33 points per game over their first six games of 2009, all losses. For whatever reason, the change from Kerry Collins to the highly efficient, nearly 100-qb-rating Young has clearly energized this team, and there is no doubt that nobody really wants to play them on their schedule late in the year in a game that might really count for something.

3. The Carolina Panthers. The Panthers are another team with a not-so-great record overall at 4-5 but who nobody really wants to play right now if they can help it. After starting off the season with three losses, losing by an average of around 17 points per game in their first three, the Panthers have now run off four wins in six games with this past weekend's 28-19 victory at home over divisional rival Atlanta. What's more, the Panthers have been playing well against and beating some tough competition these past few weeks, taking down Arizona by nearly two touchdowns on the road in Week 8, losing a close game to the Saints after holding a 17-point lead in the second half in Week 9, and now handily beating the Falcons this past weekend who also have playoff hopes. Along with that pounding running game that has seen DeAngelo Williams go for 150 yards on the ground in three of his last five games, Jake Delhomme has now gone three straight without an interception as he bids to keep his job running John Fox's offense, and now the team gears up for games at home against the Dolphins, at the Jets, and the Buccaneers at home in a winnable stretch of games that could bring the Panthers back into the NFC playoff picture in a hurry.

4. The San Diego Chargers. After starting off an inconsistent 2-3, with particular weakness on the defensive side of the ball, the Chargers have been looking good as they rattled off their fourth consecutive win this past Sunday against the Philadelphia Eagles. After tiny sparkplug type of back Darren Sproles seemed to be stealing the lead runningback job away from incumbent LaDainian Tomlinson earlier in the season, LT has reasserted himself over the past few weeks, all wins for the Chargers, as his scoring abilities combined with a really strong and fun-to-watch passing game centered on Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates make the Chargers a hard team to outscore, and an even harder team to play catch-up against. And as has been the case with Vince Young in Tennessee, even the defense seems to be keyed on to LT's re-emergence in the Chargers backfield: after allowing over 27 points per game over the first five games of the 2009 season (team went 2-3), the last four games have seen former defensive mvp Shawne Merriman recapture some of his former glory as his defense has allowed just over 16 points per game, all victories for SD. With the total collapse of Denver as an AFC power over the past month, this sets up next week's matchup in Denver as one of the best games of the year as the two 6-3 powers will meet to decide first place in the suddenly hotly-contested AFC West.

5. The Arizona Cardinals. You gotta give the Cardinals credit, as they have really overcome the last-decade history of superbowl losers having a real problem even returning to the playoffs in the following season. After just a few games in 2009 I was sure my prediction for the Cardinals to be the latest victim of the superbowl slump was coming true, as the team opened the season losing at home to division rival San Francisco and started off the year 1-2 overall with several tough-looking road games coming up on their schedule. But since Week 4, it's like a different team has been playing -- much more like last year's team -- and what has ensued has been five wins in six games to leave the Cards now with a full two-game lead over the 49ers to take down their second consecutive NFC West title. Although the running game remains the weak link of the offense, Arizona quarterback Kurt Warner is the constant, always slinging the ball with a high efficiency and keeping his team moving down the field with the help of all-pro wideouts Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin, and it's been this team's road performance that has really been the most impressive aspect of their success so far in 2009. The team is 4-0 on the road this year so far, including big wins at 5-4 Jacksonville and the 5-4 New York Giants as well as beating the Seahawks in the division and the Bears as well on the road this year. And that road record is likely to improve before all is said and done for Arizona, as still on the schedule are games at the Rams, at the Titans, at the 49ers and at the Lions to close out the team's away schedule for the season. Until the playoffs, anyways, where it is increasingly obvious the Cardinals will be come season's end, despite the streak that has plagued so many superbowl-losing teams before them.

Losers:

1. Jay Cutler and the Chicago Bears. What can you say about a guy who throws five interceptions in a 10-6 loss? I mean, any one of those picks could possibly have won the game for the Bears, and in Cutler's case this is especially true as two of his picks came in the red zone, one of them on the 49ers' 1-yard line. Cutler moved the ball ok as usual, ending up with 307 passing yards on the day, but after throwing his league-leading 6th and 7th red zone interceptions in the game, his team was simply not able to overcome their quarterback's penchant for big mistakes so far in the 2009 campaign. With a running game that still has generated just one 100-yard day for fantasy bust Matt Forte now in nine games, and a defense that has allowed more than 40 points in two of their last four, the Bears are indeed on the precipice at 4-5 after last weekend, and they're looking at games at home against an angry Eagles squad next Sunday night followed by a trip to Minnesota the week after, so it is clearly time for Cutler to put up or shut up for the season here heading into Week 11.

2. The Denver Broncos. After a 6-0 start, the Broncos have come crashing down to earth in a big way, culminating in an extremely shocking 10-point loss to the utterly hapless Washington Redskins on Sunday afternoon at FedEx field that can probably best be described as embarrassing more than anything else. This once-proud team a month ago has now given up more than 28 points per game over their last three games, all losses, after allowing just 11 points per game over their first six outings, all wins. In the end, let's not forget that this team was simply not supposed to be a good team at all before this season began, and that might be what we're seeing here as Kyle Orton seems to be getting exposed, the running game is slipping away to almost invisibility, and the defense has nearly tripled what it has been allowing other teams to score over the past few weeks. And the schedule doesn't get any easier for the Broncos either, as they are looking at a key divisional matchup with the 6-3 Chargers next Sunday, followed by a super-short week and then a Thanksgiving night game at home against a hungry New York Giants squad who are likely to be desperately in need of a win.

3. The New York Jets. Let's forget for a minute that Ryan Sanchez threw a couple of bad picks in the second half at home against the 4-4 Jacksonville Jaguars on Sunday, and instead focus on the real problem with Gang Green here in 2009: the defense. You can quote me all you want about the Jets' scoring average against, yardage, whatever numbers you want to use to make the team look better than it is. But the bottom line remains that, basically through each of the team's now five losses in 2009, the opposition has essentially moved the ball at will when it counts the most against this team. After yet another go-ahead touchdown to take a 1-point lead with just five minutes to go in the fourth-quarter against the Jags, for what seems like the umpteenth time this year to disgusted Jet fans, the Jets defense proceeded to come out and lay down for their opponents, allowing the Jags to drive down the field about 85 yards over the span of just two and a half minutes or so. In the end Maurice Jones-Drew "pulled a Westbrook" and laid down on purpose at the 1-yard line with open field to the end zone, selflessly giving up his personal stats for the sake of ensuring that the Jets did not get the ball back with more than a minute to go and a chance to do something crazy. The bottom line is that, with a rookie quarterback and rookie head coach at the helm for this team, the defense simply cannot let itself get walked all over while relying on the reputation the team built up in the preseason and the first few games that they are some kind of defensive mavens. This is no Baltimore Ravens defense, and importantly these aren't offensive juggernaut teams they are facing -- it's the Dolphins, Bills and now the Jaguars who are cutting through the Jets' D like a hot knife through butter late in the 4th quarter to snatch victories away from the Jets late in these games. The state of football in New Jersey York is severely in doubt these days, Yankees or no Yankees.

4. NFL head coaches.

4a. Bill Bellicheat of course makes the headline in this category after his very questionable decision with two minutes to go and a 6-point lead against the Colts on Sunday night football. On his own 30 yard line, Bellicheat did the unthinkable and actually opted to go for it -- yes, with a 6 point lead and yes on his own 28 yard line -- on 4th down and 2, in a situation where he could have easily punted the ball away like everyone in NFL history has figured out is the proper move in this spot, and forced the Colts to drive some 70 yards or so in a spot where they had to score a touchdown to mean anything, and do so in under two minutes. While it's true that Manning had already led two sub-two-minute td drives in the fourth quarter of this game, and I have no doubt that Peyton Manning and the potent Colts offense would have put up a tremendous onslaught in the no-huddle offense to try to get that touchdown, the bottom line is that, across the NFL this year, fewer than 30% of drives that begin on the opponents' 30 yard line or earlier result in touchdowns. Yes, that number is probably higher where Peyton Manning in concerned, but it's not like the guy scores touchdowns in 75% of his drives where he has two minutes and 75 yards to go and has to score a touchdown. And the Pats had already created two interceptions off of Manning in the game, and the Colts only managed to score on five of their 14 positions overall in the game, so it's not like the Patriots hadn't done at least a serviceable job against the Pats on the game overall. Bellicheat's downfall with this decision was that he opted to pick a play that had probably a 60% chance of winning him the game outright by making a first down, but he failed miserably in completing the expected value calculation by working out the effect of the 30-40% chance of his team losing the game outright if they missed, plus the long-term effects of screaming out to the world that he, Bill Bellicheat, has absolutely zero confidence in his own defense. It's no wonder that it took Peyton Manning all of two plays to get to the 1-yard line before punching in the winning touchdown on the night -- once Bellicheat told his defense that he didn't think they could prevent the Colts from scoring a touchdown within two minutes when starting from their 30 yard line, obviously they knew he knew they couldn't stop the Colts from scoring when starting from the Pats' 30. This might be the worst decision ever made by the biggest cheater among the NFL head coaches in the league today.

4b. Jaguars coach Jack Del Rio had Maurice Jones-Drew take a knee on the 1-yard line with about a minute to go in a 22-21 game against the Jets, a game in which the Jags were losing at the time. Then the Jags hiked the ball for two separate plays, with quarterback David Garrard just taking a knee twice in a row to set up for a last-second chip-in field goal attempt for the win. Let me repeat: the Jaguars were losing the game at the time. Of course Jags' inconsistent kicker Josh Scobee made the kick and his team won, but to think that they would not even attempt to run that ball into the end zone from the 3-inch line in three separate attempts in the final minute, when they were going ahead and hiking the ball anyways already as it was, is so indefensible that you can only laugh. It's just too bad that they didn't muff the snap on that field goal and then watch hopelessly while the clock expired and they took the 1-point loss on the game. I mean, I'm all for unselfish play, but this wasn't unselfish; it was stupid.

5. The Dallas Cowboys. Dallas once again showed their inconsistency this week, coming out after four straight wins and laying a complete egg against the Packers this past weekend at Lambeau field. In the end, the thing that bothers me the most about this loss is that the team simply didn't seem like they gave a crap about it all during the game. And head coach Wade Phillips is to blame, I solemnly guarantee you that. After winning four straight games, including key wins over NFC hopefuls with Atlanta and at Philly last weekend to give the 'Boys sole possession of first place in the NFC East, you can be confident that this team didn't do shit in practice for a week heading up to the Packers game. In the end, this game clearly went to the team that wanted it more, and in this case that was the Packers by a factor of about a thousand. The Cowboys are not likely to break their streak of no playoff wins in 13 years while Wade Phillips remains at the head coaching helm. Shanahan or Cowher, that's the big question that will remain on Cowboy fans' minds for the next several months as we get to watch "America's Team" implode yet again down the stretch.

6. The Atlanta Falcons. The Falcons are slumping. Big time. Second-year quarterback Matt Ryan is mired in a real-life sophomore slump, leading his team to three losses in their last four games after starting off the 2009 season winning four of their first five games. Not only are the Falcons now 1-4 on the road this season, something that's just not going to work if they have any real postseason aspirations at all, but Matt Ryan has now thrown 7 interceptions in his last 3 games, a problem he has not generally had in his year and a half as a professional starting quarterback in this league. With games over the next four weeks at the Giants, and later at home against the Eagles and the Saints, we're going to find out in a hurry if the Falcons plan to make a run at the playoffs this year or whether Matt Ryan's sudden penchant for poor decision-making is going to cost his team a spot in the 2009 NFL post-season.

TO watch: TO actually had his first big play of the 2009 season this weekend in Week 10, catching a 40-something yard pass in stride down the right sideline from qb Trent Edwards but stepping out of bounds at the 3 instead of finding a way to pound it in like the old TO would have. In fact, TO's 85 yards on Sunday in a blowout by the Titans represent the best single game for any Bills wideout so far in 2009. But still, TO's overall numbers outside of that one reception were not inspiring, as he ended the game with just three catches for the 85 total yards, another big drop, and of course, no touchdowns. On the season, in nine full games so far this year, TO's totals include just 26 catches for 366 yards, and one touchdown catch. That's fewer than three catches and 41 yards per game. Pathetic.

The JaMarcus Russell award: Glad to see this one back where it belongs this week, with the person who graciously gave this award its name. Before being benched early in the 4th quarter at home against the 2-6 Chiefs on Sunday afternoon, Russell managed to put up some startling numbers: 8 of 23 for 64 total yards. And no touchdowns, of course. But hey, at least he didn't throw any interceptions, right? And at least his quarterback rating of 43.6 for the game isn't his lowest for the season! Sadly, it's not even his second-lowest rating of the season, as in nine games overall in 2009, Russell has gone 96 for 205, for 1064 yards, two touchdowns and nine interceptions. That under 47% completion percentage helps Russell secure a season 47.7 qb rating so far as a starter in all nine games his team has played, and is nearly 30 percentage points below the Peyton Mannings, the Kurt Warners and the Brett Favres of the NFL, with Russell's only consistency being his total lack of consistency in any aspect of quarterback play.

Best team in the NFL? I think this one still comes down to the two unbeatens -- the 9-0 Colts and the 9-0 Saints. In my heart of hearts I still think the Saints might be the best in the NFL, although for three straight games they aren't playing like it. Once the Saints get a nice, fat loss under their belts though -- and believe me, a loss is definitely coming for this team -- then they will probably get a lot tougher, and I still have a hard time picturing any other team in the NFC coming to the dome in New Orleans in January and beating this Saints squad.

Worst team in the NFL? Let's keep this title where it's been for the past couple of weeks: in Cleveland. After Monday night's dismal performance, it is clear that nothing is happening whatsoever with the Browns franchise, from the ownership who hired Eric Mangini within seconds of his firing from the Jets, to the GM who allowed offensive players like Kellen Winslow and Braylon Edwards to leave the team for very little in return over the past year or two, and on down to the coach in Eric Mangini who is now under investigation by the NFL Players' association for the length of his practices being too tough for NFL standards. What a joke of a franchise. And how about picking a quarterback and sticking with him, or just going out and getting someone from outside the team that you can trust to start a few games in a row? So far this year, last night's starter Brady Quinn has gone 0-4 in four games for under 500 yards, one touchdown and five picks for a qb rating of 51 flat. Ugh. And the backup? Derek Anderson went 1-5 in his six starts, which have included going 66 for 154 overall -- a completion percentage that even JaMarcus Russell must sit around laughing at -- for 681 total yards, two touchdowns and nine INTs. You just can't win with either of these clowns and that offensive system, which probably explains why the Browns have become the first team since 1933 to score just five offensive touchdowns over a 15-game span. P.U.!

Labels: , ,

Monday, November 16, 2009

Sooted Connectors Hand -- Conclusion

Last Thursday I had posted some screen shots and asked some questions about how readers like to play a standard sooted connectors hand very early in a large MTT. It was the nightly pokerstars 25k guaranteed with a $27.50 buyin at 8pm ET, just the first couple of orbits. UTG limped, a few folds, and then I limped behind with 87s in clubs. We saw a five-way flop of 962 with one club, giving me an oesd, and when the action checked around to me, I bet 90 chips into the 110-chip pot. Just one player in late position called my bet, and we saw a heads-up turn card:



So, I just made my nut straight on the turn. And I picked up a flush draw. And an open-ended straight flush draw. There's 290 chips in the pot, and both myself and my opponent each have around 10x that still behind. I've now switched from win-a-small-pot mode to full chip extraction mode, and the question I posed is how would you play the hand now to give yourself the best chance to win and win big?

In a nutshell, you bet! That was the answer that mostly every commenter suggested, and I have to agree with that approach. There's two main reasons why I think a bet is almost mandatory here. First and foremost, I do not want to lose this pot at this point. Not giving this pot away after the hand I have amassed on the turn card is more important even that extracting my opponent's stack. And giving the entire pot away could very easily happen if I give this guy a free card to draw to another club that could give him a higher flush with the lone Jack, Queen, King or Ace of clubs in his hand. So I need to bet here, and the most important point is that my bet size be enough to clearly price him out of making a call with a lone high club in his hand. That' a little more than 4 to 1 against hitting on the river, so I need to bet more than a quarter of the pot to ensure that if he calls with just the one-card flush draw, that call is by definition profitable for me over the long term.

The other reason I think to bet here is one that was alluded to by a few of the commenters, and it has to do with extracting the most chips from my opponent. If I want to have a chance to get his whole stack, an all-in bet at this point would be for ten times the current pot, would look totally ridiculous, and is not going to be called by my opponent. Even a bet of twice the pot can't possibly be called really, unless the guy is holding the Ace♣ and is a total jackmonkey. But, I'm going to have that exact same problem on the river if I check here and my opponent checks behind. There's basically no way I can make a credible, callable bet on the river for most or all of my opponent's stack, unless I bet first on the turn here and get called, which will make the odds much more in favor of a sizable river bet if that's what seems like the most profitable move for me after the river card falls.

So I've got to bet this here to both maximize my chance of winning big and to minimize my chance of losing the whole pot on the river:



210 into 290. If he's got the Ace♣ and wants to call that bet, I sincerely hope he does. Because he is paying me free chips over the long haul by making this call, and because I know I can and will lay this down to almost any real action on the river if a fourth club hits. Unless it makes me a straight flush of course, in which case I probably move it all in and hope he's got the nut flush in there.

Cue the pokerstarsy river card:



Not a good card for me. There were two diamonds on the flop, and the guy called (not raised) two (not one) roughly 2/3-the-pot bets from me on the flop and the turn. Definitely the kind of play someone would make with a flush draw on the flop that did not fill on the turn, huh? And of course there's also the fact that the turn and river now made a higher runner-runner straight than the one I have, not that I am particular concerned about that longshot play but it's pokerstars, you never know. Would you lead out here, small maybe and try the blocking bet route? Or just check and hope to see a free showdown?

For me, he just played his hand so transparently like a flush draw that I dont' want to bet here. I check, and of course my opponent bets out:



Ugh. 200 chips into 910 in the pot. If that's not a suck bet, then I don't know what is. But then, it's only another 200 chips. Who's calling here, and who's folding?





Once you've decided what you would do, you can click here to see what I did.
[Edit: Link has been fixed]

Labels: , , ,